State v. Bowers’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 207 Wis. 2d 258 - State v. Smith · United States v. Fentress · United States v. Peglera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that violates the terms of the agreement and deprives the defendant of a material and substantial benefit for which he or she bargained”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“undisputedly indicates that a recommendation is to be for concurrent sentences, an undisputed recommendation of consecutive sentences that is not corrected at the sentencing hearing constitutes a material and substantial breach of the plea agreement as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“in the absence of any indication that the parties expected the State to either remain silent or recommend concurrent sentences, we are reluctant to engraft these conditions into a fully integrated plea agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.