Glover v. Crayk’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “is to effectuate the contemporaneous intent of the court and to ensure that the judgment reflects that intent.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Washington v. State · Jessica L. Tafoya v. Paul W. Tafoya

2. “review the district court's order to ascertain whether it clarified or modified the original judgment.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Kite Ranch, LLC v. Powell Family of Yakima, LLC · Jessica L. Tafoya v. Paul W. Tafoya

3. “This Court applies the same rule when construing a court order as used in construing a contract. Brockway, 921 P.2d at 1106 . The interpretation and construction of a contract is a matter of law for the Court. The language of a contract is to be construed within the context in which it was written, and this Court may look to the surrounding cireumstances, the subject matter, and the purpose of the instrument to ascertain the intent of the parties at the time it was made. Wadi Petroleum, Inc. v. Ultra Resources, Inc., 2003 WY 41, ¶ 11 , 65 P.3d 703, 708 (Wyo.2003).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Jessica L. Tafoya v. Paul W. Tafoya