Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WY 15 - Boykin v. State

Boykin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2025

9 state decisions

50200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States of America v. Ralph Winchenbach Jr · Hannon v. State · Urbigkit v. State · James v. State · Oldman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The exeeption is founded upon the proposition that a statement made during the stress of excitement resulting from a startling event is probably trustworthy, since there is not leisure to reflect, contrive or fabricate. The rule assumes the presence of a startling event which temporarily stills the senses and alleviates any motive to fabricate. A leading treatise explains that the excited utterance exception is justified by 'the special reliability that is furnished when excitement suspends the declarant's powers of reflection and fabrication." "”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “declar-ant's condition at the time was such that the statement was spontaneous, excited or impulsive rather than the product of reflection and deliberation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.