Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WY 45 - Beeman v. Beeman

Beeman v. Beeman’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2024

16 state decisions

90200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vaughn v. State · Reavis v. Reavis · Pace v. Pace · Stadtfeld v. Stadtfeld · Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means including appellant's recollection. The statement shall be served on appellee, who may serve objections or propose amendments within 15 days after service. The statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the trial court for settlement and approval and as settled and approved shall be included by the clerk of the trial court in the record on appeal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[W]e will not disturb the decision of the trial court ... in the absence of some serious procedural error, a violation of a principle of law, or a clear and grave abuse of discretion.” “Judicial discretion is a composite of many things, among which are conclusions drawn from objective criteria; it means exercising sound judgment with regard to what is right under the circumstances and without doing so arbitrarily or capriciously. We must determine whether the trial court could reasonably conclude as it did and whether any facet of its ruling was arbitrary or capricious.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(ilt is the appellant's burden to bring a complete record to this Court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.