Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2005 WY 58

Moe v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2005

Wyoming Supreme Court · decided 2005-05-10

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2017

17 state decisions

Relies on Giles v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-05-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

VOIGT, Justice,

¶1dissenting, with which STEBNER, District Judge, Retired, joins.

¶2[¶ 27] I dissent because I continue to believe that Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-3-105(a) (LexisNexis 2003) is unconstitutional, for the reasons set forth in Giles v. State, 2004 WY 101, ¶¶ 49-59, 96 P.3d 1027, 1043-46 (Wyo.2004) (Voigt, J., specially concurring). Furthermore, especially because of the vaporous nature of “indecent liberties” as a crime, I believe it constituted misconduct for the prosecutor to the tell the jury that “[everyone agrees that it was an indecent liberty.”

/2005/wy/58 · .json · Public domain