Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WY 70 - Maes v. State

Maes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2025

17 state decisions

90200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Miles v. Dorsey · United States v. Bellazerius · State v. Shouse · Van Haele v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sufficiently described the nature of the charges, including the possible penalties; informed the defendant of the right to representation; informed the defendant of the rights waived by a guilty plea; and obtained a factual basis for the plea.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he factual basis for accepting a plea may be inferred from circumstances surrounding the crime and need not be established only from the defendant's statements.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(f) Determining accuracy of plea.-Notwithstanding the acceptance of a plea of guilty, the court should not enter a judgment upon such plea without making such inquiry as shall satisfy it that there is a factual basis for the plea. [120] Also, This provision does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant who pleads is actually guilty; the rule's standard is much lower. Rule 11(f) merely requires the court to satisfy itself that a factual basis exists for the guilty plea before accepting the plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.