Pineo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Cronic · Florida v. Nixon · State v. Anaya
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether the performance of an attorney falls below the standard is a question of fact. We will not overturn a post-conviction court’s determination as to the effectiveness of trial counsel unless it is clearly erroneous and there is no competent evidence in the record to support it. Likewise, the finding of whether the petitioner was prejudiced by [his] attorney’s error is a factual finding reviewed for clear error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Fahnley v. State · Francis v. State“strategic and tactical decisions by defense counsel[, which] must be manifestly unreasonable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a deferential standard of review to the findings of a post-conviction court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fahnley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.