Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ME 21 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2026

22 state decisions

130200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · State v. Crocker · State v. Lockhart · State v. Ardolino · State v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he photographs [in Crocker ] were not merely cumulative of the medical testimony because they conveyed relevant information to the jury in a much more complete and meaningful form than could the almost clinical words of the [medical experts]. Although the photographs could be considered “gruesome,” that fact did not make them inadmissible, because the salient issue was whether their probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Although the applicable standard of review is generally depend[e]nt upon whether the alleged error is preserved, we do not need to determine whether”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “abuse of discretion standard[s] of review, which [are] more beneficial to [Haji-Hassan] than the obvious error standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.