Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ME 40 - State v. Smen

State v. Smen’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2022

14 state decisions

80200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Michaud · State v. Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal matter, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State to determine whether the trier of fact rationally could have found beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Violation of a protection from abuse order is committed when the defendant violates a temporary, emergency, interim or final protective order if the defendant has prior actual notice of the existence of the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “from having any contact, direct or indirect,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.