Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 MT 121 - State v. Mooney

State v. Mooney’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Pollard v. United States · City of Billings v. Bruce · State v. McCarthy · State v. Enright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because we conclude that Mooney has not satisfied the prejudice prong of the Barker test, we decline to address the first and second prongs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “further analysis of that prong is not only unnecessary, but inappropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.