State v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2025
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Illinois v. Allen · State v. Gallagher · State v. Tapson · State v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the effect the violation has on the defendant to determine whether the defendant suffered any conceivable prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Matt · State v. Price“such exclusion did not cause Kennedy prejudice because any opportunity Kennedy missed to question [the juror] about his conversation with [the detective] was mooted when [the juror] was removed from the jury panel and [the detective] was excluded as a witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Matt“his personal biases against [the defendant] and his very negative perception of his own client”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Ragusa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.