Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 MT 198 - Faulconbridge v. State

Faulconbridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Giambra v. Kelsey (2007), State v. Cybulski (2009)

2 district · 54 state decisions

220200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mead v. M.S.B., Inc. · Kiely Construction, L.L.C. v. City of Red Lodge Ex Rel. Red Lodge City Council · Plumb v. Fourth Judicial District Court · Bailey v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. · Newville v. State, Dept. of Family Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the request of a party, the court shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion. This rule does not authorize the exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to show the existence of a danger or defect and notice or knowledge thereof”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[e]vidence of other accidents is not admissible to show negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.