Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 MT 290 - Karlson v. Rosich

Karlson v. Rosich’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co. · Dell v. City of Lincoln · Leeper v. Leeper · Consul General for the Republic of Poland v. Illinois · Skinner v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accordingly, we remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings. It is up to the District Court to determine whether the additional taking of evidence and/or factfinding is necessary in order to determine the proper survey criteria and resolve the boundary issue in accordance with this opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “flawed because of internal inconsistencies and the application of the wrong version of the [Montana Subdivision and Platting] Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.