Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 MT 341 - State v. Upshaw

State v. Upshaw’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. Gunderson (2010), State v. Aker (2013)

34 state decisions

140200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Doyle v. Ohio · State v. Finley · State v. Montoya · State v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only in situations that implicate a defendant's fundamental constitutional rights when failing to review the alleged error may result in a manifest miscarriage of justice, leave unsettled the question of the fundamental fairness of the proceedings, or compromise the integrity of the judicial process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If the record does not fully explain why counsel failed to object to the admission of evidence, the matter is best suited for postconviction proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.