Swan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2025
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tumey v. State of Ohio · State v. Van Kirk · State v. White · Hagen v. State · State v. LaMere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have held that defense counsel's decision not to move for substitution of a trial judge rnay constitute [IAC] if the defendant establishes there is a reasonable probability that the outcome ofthe trial would have been different if counsel had moved for a substitute judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. J. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.