Creveling v. Ingold’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Corporate Air v. Edwards Jet Center (2008), Richards v. JTL Group, Inc. (2009)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. Ribi Immunochem Research, Inc. · Wurl v. Polson School District No. 23 · Pablo v. Moore · Newman v. Wittmer · State v. Kearney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is not the proper role of the judiciary to insert modifying language into clearly written and unambiguous instruments where the parties to the instrument declined to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“restrictive covenants are strictly construed and ambiguities in covenants are resolved to allow free use of property,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not to insert what has been omitted or to omit what has been inserted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.