Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ND 102 - State v. Grager

State v. Grager’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dillon v. Nissan Motor Co. · United States v. Ross · Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc. · State v. Howe · State v. Jelliff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When it becomes impossible for the Court to issue relief, no controversy exists and the issue is moot. We do not render advisory opinions and will dismiss an appeal if the issue becomes moot. If this Court were to decide the merits of the suppression argument, our decision would be purely advisory because the cases were withdrawn and the controversy no longer exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “because the State requested the district court dismiss the cases and it cannot appeal those dismissals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.