Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ND 17 - Korynta v. Korynta

Korynta v. Korynta’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Heinle v. Heinle (2010), Berge v. Berge (2006)

25 state decisions

110200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoverson v. Hoverson · Logan v. Bush · N.C.C. v. C.S.C. · Schneider v. Schaaf · Brandner v. Brandner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Calculations made under this chapter are ordinarily based upon recent past circumstances because past circumstances are typically a reliable indicator of future circumstances, particularly circumstances concerning income. If circumstances that materially affect the child support obligation are very likely to change in the near future, consideration may be given to the likely future circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Each child support order must include a statement of the net income of the obligor used to determine the child support obligation, and how that net income was determined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sufficiently documented through the use of tax returns, current wage statements, and other information to fully apprise the court of all gross income.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.