Hild v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2025
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 43 U.S.C. § 1311
Relies on Koennicke v. Maiorano · State Ex Rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com, Inc. · ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc. · J.P. Furlong Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Exploration & Production Co. · Sansing v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen there is a discrepancy in a deed between the specific description of the property conveyed and an expression of the quantity conveyed, the specific description is controlling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All of Section Twenty-one (21) ... containing 582.76 acres, more or less,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.