Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ND 225 - State v. Just

State v. Just’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Neder v. United States · Montana v. Hall · State v. Bertram

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The harmless error doctrine recognizes the principle that the central purpose of a criminal trial is to decide the factual question of the defendant’s guilt or innocence, ... and promotes public respect for the criminal process by focusing on the underlying fairness of the trial. It also prevents setting aside convictions for small errors or defects that have little, if any, likelihood of having changed the result of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.