State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Michigan v. Long · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · United States v. Hensley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A citizen informant is “ ‘someone who volunteers] information, [does] not want anything in return for the information, and [is] not at risk or in fear of going to jail.’ ” State v. Roth, 2004 ND 23, ¶ 10 , 674 N.W.2d 495 (quoting State v. Rangeloff, 1998 ND 135 , ¶ 4 n. 3, 580 N.W.2d 593 ). Information provided by a citizen informant is presumed reliable. Id.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Greg's information has a higher indicia of reliability because he was a known informant who voluntarily gave Deputy Gress information on prior occasions. Deputy Gress testified that, except for the one occasion, Greg was always truthful. The information Greg gave in this case also had a higher indicia of reliability because Greg was in Jamestown and the information involved events in Fargo, which Officer Crane verified. Greg volunteered the information knowing his son, Daniel, could be arrested if law enforcement learned about Jesse and Daniel's plan. Greg contacted Deputy Gress because he was worried about Jesse and Daniel's safety and he wanted Deputy Gress' help. Greg did not ask for anything in exchange for the information, and he was not at risk of going to jail in connection with this incident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In evaluating the factual basis for an investigatory stop, we must consider the totality of the circumstances, including the quantity, or content, and quality, or degree of reliability, of the officer's information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.