Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ND 62 - State v. Moran

State v. Moran’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2025

17 state decisions

70200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · United States v. Loud Hawk · City of Fairgo v. Thompson · United States of America v. Ronald Titlbach

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Barker explicitly .recognized that impairment of one’s defense is the most difficult form of speedy trial prejudice to prove because time’s erosion of exculpatory evidence and testimony can rarely be shown. And though time can tilt the case against either side, one cannot generally bé sure which of them it has prejudiced more severely. Thus, we generally have to recognize that excessive delay presumptively compromises thé reliability - of a -trial in ways that neither party can prove or, for that matter,- identify. While such presumptive prejudice cannot alone carry a Sixth Amendment claim without regard to the other Barker criteria, it is part of the mix of relevant facts, and its importance increases with the length of delay:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the length of the delay, (2) the reason’ for the delay, (3) the accused’s assertion of his right to a speedy trial, and (4) the prejudice to the accused. No single factor is controlling; the court must weigh all the factors' in a difficult and sensitive balancing process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If there is unnecessary delay ... in filing an information or complaint against a defendant who has been arrested or for whose arrest a warrant has been issued, ... the court may dismiss the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.