Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 ND 67 - Manning v. Manning

Manning v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Kelly · Gullickson v. Kline · Paulson v. Paulson · L.C.V. v. D.E.G. · Knutson v. Knutson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court’s decision to deny relief under N.D.R.Civ.P.60(b) will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. We do not determine whether the court was substantively correct in entering the judgment from which relief is sought, but determine only whether the court abused its discretion in ruling that sufficient grounds for disturbing the finality of the judgment were not established. An abuse of discretion occurs only when the trial court acts in an arbitrary, unconscionable, or unreasonable manner, or when its decision is not the product of a rational mental process leading to a reasoned determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A district court has broad discretion over the presentation of evidence and the conduct of trial, but it must exercise its discretion in a manner that best comports with substantial justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.