Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2006 ND 94

State v. Ruud

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2006

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2006-05-11

Decided 2006-05-11

¶1Filed 5/11/06 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72006 ND 92

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11Gregory Clifford Kaiser, Petitioner and Appellant

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20050319

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Dennis D. Fisher (on brief), 3431 4th Ave. S., Ste. 200, P.O. Box 9706, Fargo, ND 58107-9706, for petitioner and appellant.

¶30

¶31Birch P. Burdick (argued), State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.

¶32Kaiser v. State

¶33No. 20050319

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Gregory Kaiser appeals from a judgment denying his application for post-

¶37conviction relief.  Kaiser claimed he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel, his confession was coerced, the State failed to disclose exculpatory evidence, and his guilty plea was not voluntary.  The district court found Kaiser did not establish a basis for post-conviction relief.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

¶38[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶39Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶40Dale V. Sandstrom

¶41Daniel J. Crothers

¶42Mary Muehlen Maring

¶43

/2006/nd/94 · .json · Public domain