Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 NMCA 134 - State v. Kent

State v. Kent’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sutphin · State v. Garcia · State v. Woodward · State v. Davis · State v. Lankford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence review requires analysis of whether direct or circumstantial substantial evidence exists and supports a verdict of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt with respect to every element essential for conviction. We determine whether a rational factfinder could have found that each element of the crime was established beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.