State v. Bernal’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 200 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 207 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Frazier (2007), State v. Garcia (2011)
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 200 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · California v. Ramos · Swafford v. State · 30 Cal. 3d 553 - People v. Ramos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 207 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); State v. Alvarez-Lopez, 2004-NMSC-030, ¶ 40 , 136 N.M. 309 , 98 P.3d 699 (”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“in which a single act results in multiple charges under different criminal statutes[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] defendant must demonstrate that counsel’s errors were so serious, such a failure of the adversarial process, that such errors undermine[] judicial confidence in the accuracy and reliability of the outcome. A defendant must show a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Astorga
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.