Cotner v. Golden’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2021
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope · Hamid v. Sew Original · Wells v. Shriver · Harris v. West · Shebester v. Triple Crown Insurers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No exercise of judicial discretion by a District Court in a civil case at law and in equity is beyond this Court's constitutionally vested appellate jurisdiction, and a party must be afforded an opportunity for appellate review of that exercise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DOPP v. KIRKENDALL“[w]hile a noncomplying affidavit shall be returned to the prisoner [pursuant to § 2003.1 (D)] the original petition and affidavit must be preserved by the clerk for the purpose of creating a record for judicial review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DOPP v. KIRKENDALL“meaningful appellate review of a trial court order that acts as an end-of-the-line disposition of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DOPP v. KIRKENDALL
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.