Ray v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2024
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamid v. Sew Original · Chamberlin v. Chamberlin · Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co. · Johnson v. Johnson · Reaves v. Reaves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appealing party must include in the record for appeal all materials necessary for corrective relief.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“An appellant bears total responsibility for including in the appellate record all materials necessary for corrective relief.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[Dlemonstrated need during the post-matrimonial economic readjustment period; the parties' station in life; the length of the marriage and the ages of the parties; the earning capacity of each spouse; the parties' physical condition and financial means; the mode of living to which each spouse has become accustomed during the marriage; and evidence of a spouse's own income-producing capacity and the time necessary to make the transition to self-support.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.