Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 OK 5 - In Re JDH

In Re JDH’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2025

9 state decisions

50200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. Illinois · Murphy v. Sullivan · Detroit Auto Dealers Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission · Widick v. State · United States v. Newman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the declarant's apparent motive was consistent with receiving medical care; and (2) whether it was reasonable for a medical professional to rely on that statement in making a diagnosis or treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[sltatements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment and describing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain or sensations, if reasonably pertinent to diagnosis or treatment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.