Heldermon v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2025
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter · United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. · Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Groves · Brown v. Ford · Jacobs Ranch, L.L.C. v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“statewide comprehensive plan to oversee the use and protection of the public's interest in stream water, In its effort to protect this public interest, the Legislature has provided for the OWRB's involvement in all aspects of stream water use from the Oklahoma Dam Safety Act to appropriation of stream water.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.