Thrasher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2020
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. United States · United States v. Saunders · Simpson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“harassment, prejudice, confusion of the issues, the witness' safety, or interrogation that is repet itive or only marginally relevant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. FUSTON v. STATE · Mitchell v. State“The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to cross-examine witnesses; it also allows a trial judge to place reasonable limits on cross-examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FUSTON v. STATE“Not all limitations on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness run afoul of the right of confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. FUSTON v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.