Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2006 OK CR 34

Coddington v. State

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 2006-08-16

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-08-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 2010 OK CR 6 - Simpson v. State (2010), Cuesta-Rodriguez v. State (2010)

5 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

300200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LEWIS, Judge,

¶1Specially Concurs.

¶2¶ 11 agree with the State that parts of the testimony by the defendant’s mother should have been redacted; however, I concur with the opinion that prohibiting the defendant from playing the videotaped testimony to the jury denied the defendant relevant mitigating evidence.

/2006/okcr/34 · .json · Public domain