2006 Pa. Super. 332 - Commonwealth v. Pollard’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Turner · 379 Pa. Super. 390 - Commonwealth v. Finley · Commonwealth v. Gamboa-Taylor · Commonwealth v. Murray · Commonwealth v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(i) The failure to raise a claim previously was the result of interference by government officials with the presentation of the claim in violation of the constitution or laws of the Commonwealth or laws of the United States; “(fi) The facts upon which the claim is predicated were unknown to the petitioner and could not have been ascertained by the existence of due diligence; or “(iii) The right asserted is a constitutional right that was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States or the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania after the time period provided in this section and has been held by that court to apply retroactively.” (42 Pa.C.S. §9545(b) (l)(i)-(iii).)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.