2006 Pa. Super. 369 - Lanza v. Simconis’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2002 Pa. Super. 396 - Burke Ex Rel. Burke v. Bauman · 2006 Pa. Super. 278 - Commonwealth v. Flores · 2004 Pa. Super. 425 - Kelly v. Mueller · 2005 Pa. Super. 87 - Drew v. Drew · 2003 Pa. Super. 369 - Leshko v. Leshko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" Section 6107(a) requires that a hearing be conducted at which time the petitioner must prove the allegation of abuse by a preponderance of the evidence." Drew v. Drew , 870 A.2d 377 , 378 (Pa.Super.2005) (emphasis in original). In determining whether a hearing pursuant to Section 6107(a) comports with due process, this Court has held that the parties must, at a minimum, have the opportunity to present witnesses, testify on one's behalf, and cross-examine the opposing party and his/her witnesses. See Drew , supra ; Leshko v. Leshko , 833 A.2d 790 (Pa.Super.2003). Lanza v. Simconis , 2006 PA Super 369 , ¶ 10, 914 A.2d 902 , 906 (2006) The Parties must, at a minimum, have the opportunity to present witnesses, testify on one's behalf, and cross-examine the opposing party and his/her witnesses." R.G. v. TD., 448 Pa. super. 525, 672 A.2d 341 , 343 (Pa. super. 1996). Rizk v. Barghoutt , No. 898 MDA 2012, 2014 WL 10936780 , at (Pa. Super Ct. Apr. 14, 2014)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. S.W. v. S.F.“The court may enter such a temporary order as it deems necessary to protect the plaintiff or minor children when it finds they are in immediate and present danger of abuse. The order shall remain in effect until modified or terminated by the court after notice and hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. S.W. v. S.F.“[w]ithin ten business days of the filing of a petition under this chapter, a hearing shall be held before the court, at which the plaintiff must prove the allegation of abuse by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.