Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 SD 43 - State v. Krebs

State v. Krebs’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably State v. Cottier (2008), State v. Roach (2012)

32 state decisions

170200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The seriousness of the alleged felony offense to the community and whether protection of the community requires waiver; (2) Whether the alleged felony offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated or willful manner; (3) Whether the alleged felony offense was against persons or property with greater weight being given to offenses against persons; (4) The prosecutive merit of the complaint. The state is not required to establish probable cause to show prosecutive merit; (5) The desirability of trial and disposition of the entire felony offense in one proceeding if the child’s associates in the alleged felony offense are adults; (6) The record and previous history of the juvenile; (7) The prospect for adequate protection of the public and the likelihood of reasonable rehabilitation of the juvenile, if the juvenile is found to have committed the alleged felony offense, by the use of procedures, services, and facilities currently available to the juvenile court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Material prejudice is established 'when in all probability ... it produced some effect upon the final result and affected the rights of the party assigning it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.