Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 SD 50 - State v. Lafferty

State v. Lafferty’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2020

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

60200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Green v. United States · Garrett v. United States · State v. Dillon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the test to be applied to determine whether there are two separate offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The true intent of the legislature is ascertained primarily from the language of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.