Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 SD 55 - Grajczyk v. Tasca

Grajczyk v. Tasca’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. FIFTEEN IMPOUNDED CATS (2010), March v. Thursby (2011)

39 state decisions

200200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc. · Fierro v. California · Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Fsa v. Oaklawn Apartments · Industria Panificadora, S. A. v. United States · Giannakos v. Bravo Trader

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defense of lack of jurisdiction over the person, insufficiency of process, or insufficiency of service of process is waived (A) if omitted from a motion ... described in § 15-6-12(g), or (B) if it is neither made by motion under § 15-6-12 nor included in a responsive pleading or an amendment thereof permitted by § 15 — 6—15(a) to be made as a matter of course.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party who makes a motion under § 15 — 6— 12 may join with it any other motions herein provided for and then available to him. If a party makes a motion under § 15-6-12 but omits therefrom any defense or objection then available to him which § 15-6-12 permits to be raised by motion, he shall not thereafter make a motion based on the defense or objection so omitted, except a motion as provided in subdivision 15 — 6— 12(h)(2) on any of the grounds there stated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the president, partner or other head of the entity, officer, director, or registered agent thereof. If any of the above cannot be conveniently found, service may be made by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at any office of such business entity within this state, with the person in charge of such office....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.