Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 SD 64 - Wisner v. Pavlin

Wisner v. Pavlin’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sayers v. Pyland · Laster v. First Huntsville Properties Co. · Johnson v. Hendrickson · Banner v. Welch · Squibb v. Squibb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he cases uniformly hold or assume ... that the homestead rights of a cotenant, or of his spouse or family, in respect of his interest in the common property are not a bar to partition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “occupation of the property... as a homestead did not enlarge [an] interest therein against ... cotenants, and it was at all times ... subject to partition at the suit of [the] cotenants”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “while one tenant in common may acquire homestead rights in the common property, the rights so acquired are not superior to the rights and remedies of the other joint owners”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.