State v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2023
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruton v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante · Colorado v. Connelly · Mincey v. Arizona · Nix v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Although there are often subsidiary factual questions deserving deference, the voluntariness of a confession is ultimately a legal question." State v. Tuttle, 2002 SD 94, ¶ 20 , 650 N.W.2d 20, 30 (citing Miller v. Fenton, 474 U.S. 104, 116 , 106 S.Ct. 445, 452-53 , 88 L.Ed.2d 405, 414-15 (1985) (additional citations omitted)). This Court reviews the entire record and makes an independent determination of voluntariness. Id. (citing Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 348 , 96 S.Ct. 1612, 1617 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1, 8 (1976) (additional citations omitted)). The State must establish the voluntariness of a confession by a preponderance of the evidence. Id. 21 (citing Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377, n. 5 (1984)).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the defendant’s age; level of education and intelligence; the presence or absence of any advice to the defendant on constitutional rights; the length of detention; the repeated and prolonged nature of the questioning; the use of psychological pressure or physical punishment, such as deprivation of food or sleep; and the defendant’s prior experience with law enforcement officers and the courts. Finally, deception or misrepresentation by the officer receiving the statement may also be factors for the trial court to consider; however, the police may use some psychological tactics in interrogating a suspect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owen“not constitute reversible error if the State can prove the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People Ex Rel. Jmj
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.