State v. Holm’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Bronson v. Swensen (2007), State v. Low (2008)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · United States v. O'Brien · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Kolender v. Lawson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We presume that the legislature used each word advisedly and give effect to each term according to its ordinary and accepted meaning.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Only when we find that a statute is ambiguous do we look to other interpretive tools ....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A decision to admit or exclude expert testimony is left to the discretion of the trial court, and that decision will not be reversed unless it constitutes an abuse of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.