Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 UT 42 - State v. Beckstead

State v. Beckstead’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2023

20 state decisions

160200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cole · Key Design Inc. v. Moser · State v. Visser · State v. Benvenuto · State v. Hittle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ruling on a motion to withdraw a guilty plea only when we are convinced that the court has abused its discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Thhe ultimate question of whether the [trial] court strictly complied with constitutional and procedural requirements for entry of a ... plea is a question of law that is reviewed for correctness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “assess not only the verbal content of the defendant's responses, but also the entire spectrum of verbal and nonverbal behavior that comprises his presence before the judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.