Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 UT 50 - State v. Levin

State v. Levin’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably State v. Maestas (2012), State v. Low (2008)

85 state decisions

480200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Stansbury v. California · State v. Pena

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the degree of variety and complexity in the facts to which the legal rule is to be applied; (2) the degree to which a [district] court's application of the legal rule relies on facts observed by the ... judge, such as a witness's appearance and demeanor, relevant to the application of the law that cannot be adequately reflected in the ree-ord available to appellate courts; and (8) other policy reasons that weigh for or against granting discretion to [district] courts.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The correctness of the court of appeals' decision turns, in part, on whether it accurately reviewed the trial court's decision under the appropriate standard of review.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the site of interrogation; (2) whether the investigation focused on the accused; (8) whether the objective indicia of arrest were present; and (4) the length and form of interrogation.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.