State v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “and held that 'the date of the oral announcement of the sentence to the defendant is the date of imposition of sentence for all purposes.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Udy · 2011 UT App 158 - State v. Grant

2. “motion for new trial shall be made within 10 days after imposition of sentence.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Udy · 2011 UT App 158 - State v. Grant

3. “: Rule 22 certainly seems to contemplate that imposing sentence and entering the written judgment of conviction are two distinct actions. If so, only the oral announcement of the sentence is available to qualify as the act of imposing sentence. Id. T7. Because the supreme court held that the date of the oral announcement of sentence was the”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2011 UT App 158 - State v. Grant