Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 UTAPP 177 - State v. Beck

State v. Beck’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Quercia v. United States · United States v. Filani · State v. Gardner · United States v. Nickl · State v. Casey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish 'extraordinary circumstances,' a defendant must establish that the error is the type of 'rare procedural anomal[y]' that, if left unreviewed, would result in manifest injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is harmful, ie., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant, or phrased differently, our confidence in the verdict is undermined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any unnecessary comments by the court are too likely to have a detrimental effect on the jury's ability to decide the case impartially.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.