Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 UT App 232 - State v. Wallace

2006 UT App 232 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Colwell · State v. Clark · State v. Virgin · State v. Brooks · State v. McClain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Utah Supreme Court 'hals]l held that intent to commit a crime may be inferred from the actions of the defendant or from surrounding cireumstances.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “circumstantial evidence to support a reasonable inference that [defendant] possessed the requisite mental state”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “he is aware of the nature of his conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.