State v. Bujan’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2025
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tome v. United States · State v. Holgate · 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · State v. Hamilton · State v. Rimmasch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'permits the introduction of a declarant's consistent out-of-court statements to rebut a charge of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive ... when those statements were made before the charged recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.!”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We begin our analysis by noting that Defendant correctly states that rule 801(d)(1)(B) as applied under the Federal Rules of Evidence does not allow postmotive statements to be admitted for a rehabilitative purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bujan“In this instance, because [D.V. essentially requests this court] to address the meaning of a rule of evidence, there is a question of law and we assess the trial court's ruling for correctness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. D.V. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.