2006 UT App 324 - State v. Robbins’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club · Quock Ting v. United States · Crutcher v. Commonwealth of Kentucky · 15 Cal. 3d 143 - People v. Mayberry · State v. Dunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Iwle will reverse only if the evidence is so inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'reverse the jury's verdict in a eriminal case [only] when we conclude as a matter of law that the evidence was insufficient to warrant conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'we review the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.