2006 UT App 355 - State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “'the adversarial process that our system counts on to produce just results.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2008 UT App 152 - In Re Adoption of KCJ · In Re Adoption of K.C.J.

2. “[O] the nine prospective jurors indicating bias who were questioned further in this case, mone of them served on the jury. And the majority of thiem-six of the nine-were dismissed for cause, while two more were removed by peremptory strikes. Given this statistical reality, it seems highly unlikely that after further questioning the two overlooked jurors would have both been allowed to sit on the jury-both of them being passed for cause and both of them avoiding peremptory strikes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. King

3. “presuming prejudice rather than requiring King to demonstrate the existence of palpable prejudice is necessary as a practical matter in this case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. King