Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2006 UTAPP 394 - Orvis v. Johnson

Orvis v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · State of New Hampshire v. State of Maine · Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance · Ryan Operations Gp Nvr Lp Nvr v. Santiam-Midwest Lumber Co Bright Wood Corp · Allen v. Zurich Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where there is no evidence that the party against whom judicial estoppel is sought knowingly misrepresented any facts in the prior proceeding and where the party seeking to invoke judicial estoppel had equal or better access to the relevant facts”); Orvis v. Johnson, 2006 UT App 394, ¶ 15 , 146 P.3d 886 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.