State v. Nieberger’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · Boyce Motor Lines, Inc. v. United States · United States v. LaHue · State v. Green · State v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Alny person who knowingly or intentionally causes or permits a child or elder adult to be exposed to, to ingest or inhale, or to have contact with a controlled substance, chemical substance, or drug paraphernalia as defined in Subsection (1), is guilty of a felony of the third degree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gallegos“It is the application of the [challenged statutes] to defendants by law enforcement officials we review; in an 'as applied examination, defendants may not generalize beyond the conduct with which they are charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Umited States v. LaHue, 261 F.3d 993 , 1007 (10th Cir.2001); see also State v. Nieberger, 2006 UT App 5, ¶17 , 128 P.3d 1223 , cert. denied, 138 P.3d 589 (Utah 2006). An as-applied challenge”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.